Many historians argue that the us constitution creates a neutral, level playing field on which contestants prove their worth (that…

Many historians argue that the us constitution creates a neutral, level playing field on which contestants prove their worth (that any inequality in wealth is not due to unfair rules but to unequal abilities). Considering Zinn’s reasons for disagreement with this interpretation, which side of the argument would you support and why?

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Order Over WhatsApp Place an Order Online